The Free Methodist Church’s Response to Sexuality and Sexual Orientation

Anyone living in 21st century North America should be familiar with changing societal mores regarding human sexuality. Most pastors have frequent opportunities for ministry and face questions pertaining to Biblical teaching on sexual matters and how it applies to their ministry- preaching, teaching, baptism, discipleship, membership and marriage. What is the Free Methodist Church’s position, understanding of and ministry counsel related to these matters?

The Biblical and historic understanding of the church on sexuality and marriage have remained largely unchanged in most of Protestantism and other Orthodox movements of the church throughout the centuries. But, societal changes in terminology and sexual expression press the church to clarify its terms and shape the church’s response while maintaining integrity with Scripture and the church’s doctrine. Refining responses and engaging societally changing norms is important for all pastors. Freelancing in theology praxis resulting in simply succumbing to societal pressure for conformity or developing unhealthy and graceless responses are not options for pastoral response. The church’s primary task remains to serve Christ and remain faithful to Him and His Word.

Fidelity to a Biblical hermeneutic and Scriptural authority has been sacrificed on this one issue in many churches and denominations. Modifying Biblical interpretation in ways that forsake sound exegesis in this one area renders suspect exegetical integrity on all other matters. The list of churches and denominations that have modified their exegesis resulting in a diminished their view of Scriptural authority are numerous. This has become a hermeneutical watershed for many since the Scriptures are consistent and clear on most issues connecting gender relationships as it relates to sexuality.

The position of the Free Methodist Church on God’s fundamental design for sexual expression is found in the church’s statements in Chapter 3 of the Book of Discipline, specifically in Paragraph 3215 (see also 3214) and matters of monogamy and marriage in Paragraph 3311. A more robust Biblical explanation on same sex behavior is spelled out in the Study Commission on Doctrine’s (SCOD) paper entitled, “Homosexuality According to the Bible . . . .” by Dr. David Bauer and located online at http://fmcusa.org/files/2014/03/HOMOSEXUALITY-ACCORDING-TO-THE-BIBLE.pdf. Dr. Bauer exegetes the Scriptures consistently with history’s most rigorous and exacting interpretations on these matters. Dr. Howard Snyder wrote a Seedbed monograph entitled, “Homosexuality and the Church: Defining Issue or Distracting Battle?” It apologetically addresses these matter from the Biblical/historical perspective held by the church throughout the ages.

A general framing document addressing the matter of same sex relationships and marriage from the posture of the FMCUSA entitled, “Framing a Mission Response . . . On Same Sex Relationships” by Bishop David W. Kendall which can be found at http://fmcusa.org/files/2014/03/Framing-a-Missional- Response-to-21st-Century-Issues-Same-Sex-Relationships.pdf. The intent of this document is to summarize our position while stating our preferred ministry posture.

Pastoral aids for understanding same sex attraction, orientation and relationship and describing how to best minister to those impacted within their congregations include Dr. Bruce Cromwell’s writing, “Homosexuality and the Historic Church” located at http://fmcusa.org/files/2014/08/Homosexuality-

and-the-Church-Historic.pdf and Dr. Denny Wayman’s writing, “God’s Love Expressed and Experienced” located at http://fmcusa.org/files/2014/03/Gods-Love-Expressed-Offering-Pastoral-Care-to-LGB- Persons-and-Families.pdf. Both of these documents are crafted by pastors. They familiarize the pastor/reader with not only the church’s historic understanding, but a hopeful and relevant approach to ministry. Dr. Wayman’s article incorporates a case study.

Implications and Guidance for Free Methodist Local Church Pastors

Many pastors have asked, “What are we to do in dealing with challenges to the church’s understanding on LGBTQI matters? How do we minister, preach the good news, and serve those impacted by these lifestyle choices? We offer some comments and suggestions that will guide healthy pastoral thinking and ministry.

  1. The cultural war has been waged over this topic for decades. Positions unfriendly to the Biblical/historical understanding of the church have prevailed in both society and law. The most common expressions are the legalization of same sex marriage, social acceptance of and legalized benefits for cohabitation and domestic partnerships outside the bonds of marriage. Additionally the general tolerance of or advocacy for sex outside of marriage has changed. As a result, heterosexual, monogamous marriage has little more acceptance than other cohabitation alternatives. That does not give pastors or churches permission to alter church doctrine or membership covenants in these matters. The church at its best has always sought to honor Christ and His Word, not simply mirror societal mores back to the society in which it ministers. We are to be Christo-centric, mirroring Christ- his love and truth- in a fallen world. It should challenge us to “speak the truth in love” in meaningful and helpful ways in our ministry.
  2. This shift by many unfriendly to the Biblical/historical position has moved this discussion from one classically framed by moral choice and selected behavior with consequences for breach of fidelity in faith to one of biological necessity (genetics) and justice- human rights. Such cannot be supported by Scripture or defended by church history. Though societal shift has taken place regarding homosexuality specifically, other sinful sexual expressions are not treated by society in general as matters of biological necessity or human rights (Leviticus 18:6-23; 19:20-22; 20:10- 21 et. al.). For example, matters like infidelity in relationship (adultery and fornication), incest (host of family relationships engaged in inappropriate sexual relationships), pederasty, and bestiality are unquestionably moral choices both in the Biblical record and as in society at large. Whether these are socially acceptable or socially abhorrent, no defense based on biological necessity or justice is leveraged with the exception of homosexual expression (verse 22) which has led to the movement toward legal equality and social acceptance. It could be easily argued that this particular shift has been intentionally directed for or by specific communities over the past 25 years. No strong, socially accepted advocacy for other sexual expressions of brokenness and sin have been successfully forwarded to the point of social and legal acceptance. Hence they are for the most part still deemed as moral sexual choice. They are either largely ignored as acceptable in society or excoriated as reprehensible behavior.
  3. Many in the medical and psychological community as well as in pedestrian circles attach “orientation” and “identity” to sexuality, which on the most fundamental level misplaces the role of sex in defining person and human value. Ministry here as well as with all persons engaged in or trapped by any sin, must focus upon the person as created in the image of God (original design, core identity with orientation toward God) yet bent toward sin (competing and reshaping identity with orientation toward self). We understand the fall of humanity and the consequent orientation toward sin and self that God, in Christ redeems and reverses. Our identity is only truly perfected in Christ and cannot be fulfilled through sex or any other behavior or bent. Human orientation angles toward sin and self-fulfillment which, at its core, opposes God and correction. But, one of the key markers to mental, emotional and spiritual health is impulse control. Therefore, discipleship always will lead to restraint and mature resistance to
  4. The good news is that God’s grace applies here as everywhere. Sexual sins are not unforgivable. They are not destructive to the point of pushing a person beyond the God’s redemptive hand. It would be a travesty to believe that no grace is required, no sin is involved and no breach in relationship with God is at stake in this or any other area where the Biblical record clearly identifies behaviors as sinful. Equally devastating would be to believe that these are sins from which it is impossible to recover or find forgiveness. Pastors must minister truth AND grace. It is critically important to do both. Truth requires teaching- something some pastors may feel unqualified or may be reluctant to do in such a socially charged atmosphere. But, courageous Biblical instruction is important. Without it, the divide widens and social mores embed as acceptable on the basis of pastoral silence. Teaching the Biblical understanding of sin and the hope of salvation is essential for effective ministry.Grace requires a loving, non-condemning, welcoming environment that allows the Holy Spirit to do his work of conviction, comfort, revelation and empowerment. Grace requires pastors and people to refuse certain behaviors to determine human value and worthiness of love and respect. Grace and truth together require pastors and people to understand what wholeness and holiness in Christ look like and to be prepared to lovingly disciple people toward holy living.
  5. What does that level of discipleship look like in practical, day-to-day ministries for Free Methodist pastors? Following is a pastoral guide, not an exhaustive list of all ministry challenges or possibilities related to human sexuality.

The Study Commission on Doctrine is committed to creating additional resources in the future that will assist pastors and lay leaders as they minister to a wide range of people who experience brokenness and seek healing regarding sexuality and other areas of life.